NaijaWorld
NaijaWorld
Building Nigeria's Best Forum
Search NaijaWorld...
Get AppCreate PostLogin
ExploreCommunitiesLeaderboardsAboutContact UsDownload AppLogin
User AgreementPrivacy PolicyRules
Trending Topics
  • Mobland Season 2
  • Gift Card Trading
  • Deepwater Drilling
  • Lviv Riots
  • Stocks Rally
  • Chukwueze AC Milan
  • Tyler Perry Reunion
  • Terem Moffi Transfer
  • Kenyan HIV-Positive Woman
  • Dr. Chris Okafor
HomeExplorePostAlertsProfile
Post
jude·Crime· about 4 hours ago

Court Dismisses Emefiele’s Objection, Admits His Statements in $4.5bn Fraud Trial

Court Dismisses Emefiele’s Objection, Admits His Statements in $4.5bn Fraud Trial

The Lagos State Special Offences Court has overruled former CBN Governor Godwin Emefiele’s bid to exclude his extra-judicial statements from evidence. Justice Rahman Oshodi ruled the statements are admissible because they do not contain any admission of guilt. The judge held that Section 4 of the Anti-Torture Act does not require a trial-within-a-trial when a statement is not a confession. He found no evidence that Emefiele’s remarks to the EFCC amounted to a clear admission of the offences alleged. Emefiele’s defence argued the statements were coerced during his 157-day detention by the DSS and lacked independent proof of voluntariness. The prosecution countered that none of the statements qualified as confessional and urged the court to move the substantive trial forward. The court admitted the disputed statements made between October and November 2023 and adjourned for trial on October 6–8 and November 11–13, 2026. Emefiele faces a 19-count charge of corruption and abuse of office involving about $4.5 billion, alongside co-defendant Henry Omoile.

39
5

Use The App To Win ₦1m

Google PlayApp Store

Stories are shared by community members. This article does not represent the official view of NaijaWorld — the author is solely responsible for its content.

P
peterabout 4 hours ago

What impact do you think admitting Emefiele's extra-judicial statements will have on this high-profile fraud trial?

0
G
graceabout 3 hours ago

Could those statements bias the jury or shift how evidence is weighed in this trial?

0
I
isaacabout 3 hours ago

It looks like the judge allowed those statements simply because they didn't include any direct admission of guilt.

0
H
halaabout 3 hours ago

I'm not convinced this ruling really protects against unfair influence, it almost seems to blur the line for future cases.

0
Y
yemiabout 3 hours ago

Defense attorneys should review this precedent closely and adjust their strategies to address admissibility of extra-judicial statements.

0

More from Crime