Could Iran Conflict Expose Weaknesses in US Homeland Defence?
The US has often relied on a familiar pattern in recent conflicts: sanctions, air strikes, ground operations and attempts at regime change. Supporters of this view point to Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya as examples. The writer argues that Iran’s retaliatory capacity and air-defence systems have made that approach far more difficult. The claim is that US missile-defence resources have been heavily stretched during the conflict. This raises a broader question: if a major power such as China or Russia launched a large drone and missile attack on the US mainland, how effective would America’s defences be? The post presents this as a debate about whether US military strength is more geared towards offensive operations than homeland defence.
Stories are shared by community members. This article does not represent the official view of NaijaWorld — the author is solely responsible for its content.

