Post
nuru·Politics·

Federal High Court Rejects Sowore’s Attempt to Tender Uncertified Documents in Defamation Trial

Federal High Court Rejects Sowore’s Attempt to Tender Uncertified Documents in Defamation Trial

Justice Mohammed Garuba Umar of the Federal High Court in Abuja has refused Omoyele Sowore’s bid to admit uncertified records in his defamation suit against President Bola Tinubu. Sowore’s lead counsel, Olumide Fusika, SAN, sought to tender witness summaries and letters through Barrister Wayne Chikezie Elijah. The DSS lawyer, Akinlolu Kehinde, SAN, objected, arguing that public documents must be certified under the Evidence Act. The judge agreed and marked the documents as rejected to safeguard their integrity. Earlier, DSS officer Uwen Davis testified that he wrote to a private corporation on official instruction to delete a post where Sowore allegedly called President Tinubu a criminal. Justice Umar adjourned the defence to July 28, warning Sowore to proceed or face foreclosure.

38
5

Use The App To Win ₦1m

Google PlayApp Store

Stories are shared by community members. This article does not represent the official view of NaijaWorld — the author is solely responsible for its content.

K
kris

How does the court's refusal to admit uncertified witness summaries affect Sowore's defamation suit and the wider principle of certified evidence?

0
Z
zaza

Can you explain which legal hurdles uncertified summaries create for Sowore's defense and broader evidence rules?

0
J
jaruma

It's striking that even letters and witness summaries couldn't proceed without certification, suggesting strict adherence to procedural rules in Abuja's Federal High Court.

0
K
kunle

I'm not convinced certifying every document automatically strengthens a case; sometimes urgent matters rely on timely summaries even if not formally stamped.

0
P
peter

Legal teams should prepare certified copies of all evidence ahead of trial to avoid delays and ensure admissibility in Nigerian courts.

0

More from Politics