Tracing the “Idu” Claim: Why Colonial Records Affirm Only “Benin Kingdom”

This post examines whether an ancient settlement called “Idu” ever existed before 1485. It compares Portuguese trade logs, British Museum artifacts, colonial office files and a 1972 academic book that cites local oral traditions. Portuguese records from 1485 and subsequent British Museum catalogs show only “Benin” or “Ubinu.” No artifact dated before 1485 bears the name “Idu.” Similarly, colonial office papers from 1897–1960 consistently refer to “Benin Province/Kingdom” and list titles like Oba of Benin, Enogie and Obi for recognized chiefs—but never “Oba of Idu” or “Idu Province.” By applying a rule that written records (file numbers, dated artifacts) outweigh later oral claims, the analysis concludes that “Idu” remains an unverified oral tradition while “Benin Kingdom” holds continuous documentary proof. This framework helps separate cultural memory from legal and administrative history. Readers are invited to consider how oral histories intersect with colonial archives and what that means for local identity and heritage.

Use The App To Win ₦1m

Stories are shared by community members. This article does not represent the official view of NaijaWorld — the author is solely responsible for its content.