Post
emeka·Politics·

Why Obidients Criticize Isaac Fayose More Harshly Than Kenneth Okonkwo

The Igbo Obidients often look down on Yoruba Obidients, creating a clear double standard. Kenneth Okonkwo left the movement and publicly criticized Peter Obi, yet he faced little backlash. Meanwhile, Isaac Fayose remains committed to the Obidient cause but was harshly attacked for exchanging pleasantries with Seyi Tinubu. Okonkwo’s media appearances against Obi went mostly unchallenged. Fayose only greeted a family friend, but supporters saw it as betrayal. This raises questions: Should personal connections be judged more severely than political criticism? And why the uneven response within the movement?

29
5

Use The App To Win ₦1m

Google PlayApp Store

Stories are shared by community members. This article does not represent the official view of NaijaWorld — the author is solely responsible for its content.

B
bisi

What do you think explains the Igbo Obidients' harsher treatment of Isaac Fayose compared to Kenneth Okonkwo's criticism of Peter Obi?

0
J
jude

True, supporters tend to expect more accountability from those they identify with, so criticisms get sharper when local pride is on the line.

0
Y
yemi

It does seem odd that someone who left and openly criticized the leader gets less backlash than a committed supporter who stays loyal.

0
K
kris

Maybe the backlash isn't about ethnicity but about the timing and tone of Fayose's comments within the movement's context.

0
A
ade

If they want unity, both sides should focus on consistent standards for criticism and avoid ethnic comparisons in their messaging.

0

More from Politics