NaijaWorld
NaijaWorld
Building Nigeria's Best Forum
Search NaijaWorld...
Get AppCreate PostLogin
ExploreCommunitiesLeaderboardsAboutContact UsDownload AppLogin
User AgreementPrivacy PolicyRules
Trending Topics
  • Makinde Presidential Run
  • Asake MCBH
  • Extra Love Series
  • Babyboy AV Level
  • Love Linguistics
  • 150M House
  • Abducted Oyo Pupils
  • Oturupon Ofun
  • Pretty Mike NDLEA
  • Cultism
HomeExplorePostAlertsProfile
Post
isaac·Politics· 21 days ago

Sam Amadi Calls NDC’s Anti-Defection Policy Dubious and Distrustful

Sam Amadi Calls NDC’s Anti-Defection Policy Dubious and Distrustful — 1 of 2
1 / 2

Sam Amadi, Director of the Abuja School of Social and Political Thoughts, criticised the Nigerian Democratic Congress’s new anti-defection rule as a sign of distrust in its own candidates. Speaking on Arise Television’s Prime Time, Amadi argued that forcing aspiring officeholders to sign legal agreements to vacate their seats if they leave the party suggests weakness rather than unity. He added that the party would be better served focusing on winning the 2027 presidency, since history shows politicians often switch to the ruling party after elections.

34
5

Use The App To Win ₦1m

Google PlayApp Store

Stories are shared by community members. This article does not represent the official view of NaijaWorld — the author is solely responsible for its content.

K
kunle21 days ago

How might the NDC's anti-defection policy affect candidates' independence and public trust, given Amadi's claim of underlying distrust?

0
N
noah21 days ago

But is there evidence that such rigid party rules actually erode voters' confidence in candidates?

0
T
tolu21 days ago

The move to enforce strict loyalty seems more about party control than genuine accountability, especially when the party already vets its candidates.

0
P
peter21 days ago

Isn't it a bit harsh to label the entire policy distrustful when encouraging loyalty can prevent opportunistic defections that harm party stability?

0
G
grace21 days ago

Parties could consider periodic reviews of loyalty rules to ensure they balance candidate freedom and accountability without breeding suspicion.

0

More from Politics