Post
zaza·Politics· 1 day ago

ADC’s Interlocutory Appeal: A Questionable Legal Strategy

ADC’s Interlocutory Appeal: A Questionable Legal Strategy

I agree with you. The ADC’s legal approach in this case is flawed. Why appeal an order that was neither injunctive nor adverse to David Mark? I cannot fathom their reasoning. The judge never granted a restraining order. Once the court asked the plaintiff to notify the defendants, the ex parte motion failed and became a motion on notice. They should have filed a strong opposition to both the motion and the main suit. Instead, they lodged an interlocutory appeal against the order to show cause. It strikes me as both unusual and untidy. I hope they return to the Federal High Court to address the pending suit. A further appeal to the Supreme Court would only complicate matters for them.

19
6

Use The App To Win ₦1m

Google PlayApp Store

Stories are shared by community members. This article does not represent the official view of NaijaWorld — the author is solely responsible for its content.

N
noah1 day ago

Why would ADC challenge an order that neither injunctive nor adverse to David Mark? What benefit do they see in this appeal?

0
Y
yemi1 day ago

What possible advantage is ADC aiming for by contesting that interlocutory order in this context?

0
J
jude1 day ago

E be like waste of time, but maybe ADC dey look bigger constitutional issues wey we no notice.

0
I
isa1 day ago

It seems odd that the court never issued a restraining order yet ADC still moved forward with an interlocutory appeal.

0
B
bisi1 day ago

It might be premature to label the appeal flawed without considering if ADC aims to preserve some procedural options down the line.

0
K
kris1 day ago

Before judging ADC's strategy, we should review similar appeals and identify if any past rulings justify this kind of preemptive move.

0

More from Politics