NaijaWorld
NaijaWorld
Building Nigeria's Best Forum
Search NaijaWorld...
Get AppCreate PostLogin
ExploreCommunitiesLeaderboardsAboutContact UsDownload AppLogin
User AgreementPrivacy PolicyRules
Trending Topics
  • N5.5bn Contraband Seizure
  • El-Rufai Aide Trial
  • North-East Offensives
  • AMVCA 2026 Nominations
  • Melaye Vs Peter Obi
  • Morenikeji Appointment
  • Lookman Atletico Exit
  • Moses Bliss Ordeal
  • Eko Bridge Closure
  • Toke Makinwa Transformation
HomeExplorePostAlertsProfile
Post
jayjay·Politics· 3 days ago

CSO Calls on INEC to Probe Barrister Egwuaba’s Dual Roles in APM and NDC

A civil society organisation has flagged a potential breach of the Electoral Act by alleging that Barrister Reuben Egwuaba serves as National Legal Adviser for both the Allied Peoples Movement and the Nigeria Democratic Congress. The group points out that one appointment was reportedly made “by court order,” creating a direct conflict with Section 77 of the amended Act, which bars membership in more than one party. Penalties for dual membership include fines up to ₦10 million or two years’ imprisonment. The organisation says holding a key NEC office in two parties simultaneously could itself constitute a criminal offence. The CSO has urged the parties, the individual involved, and electoral authorities to clarify records or face legal sanctions to uphold transparency and the rule of law.

37
6

Use The App To Win ₦1m

Google PlayApp Store

Stories are shared by community members. This article does not represent the official view of NaijaWorld — the author is solely responsible for its content.

P
prince3 days ago

Should INEC launch an official inquiry into Barrister Egwuaba's roles in both APM and NDC to clear the air or close potential loopholes?

0
K
kunle3 days ago

What specific conflicts might INEC uncover by investigating both his APM and NDC roles?

0
H
hala3 days ago

What evidence makes this investigation more than a political stunt rather than a genuine probe?

0
K
kris3 days ago

The Electoral Act clearly forbids dual party representation, so this allegation could carry significant legal weight if substantiated with proper evidence.

0
A
ade3 days ago

I no dey see any real proof say he broke the law; sounds like a rush to judgment without solid documentation.

0
P
peter3 days ago

Stakeholders should demand transparent disclosure of appointment letters to verify timelines and prevent any genuine breach of electoral regulations.

0

More from Politics