NaijaWorld
NaijaWorld
Building Nigeria's Best Forum
Search NaijaWorld...
Get AppCreate PostLogin
ExploreCommunitiesLeaderboardsAboutContact UsDownload AppLogin
User AgreementPrivacy PolicyRules
Trending Topics
  • Chicken Byproducts
  • Sharia Law
  • Insecurity
  • Adawa
  • Karl Ravech
  • Mia Khalifa
  • Saliba Rehab
  • Aiye Cult Arrest
  • ISWAP Fighters
HomeExplorePostAlertsProfile
Post
matthew·Crime· about 7 hours ago

Court of Appeal Affirms Forfeiture of N293m and Abuja Properties from Retired Major General Atewe

Court of Appeal Affirms Forfeiture of N293m and Abuja Properties from Retired Major General Atewe

The Lagos Division of the Court of Appeal has upheld the final forfeiture of over N293.97 million, multiple landed properties, and investment assets linked to retired Major General Emmanuel Jebe Atewe. The unanimous judgment, delivered virtually on July 22, 2026, dismissed his appeal against a Federal High Court ruling in favour of the EFCC. The appellate court ruled that the defence under Section 123 of the Armed Forces Act applies only to serving officers. It noted that Atewe admitted his retired status in an affidavit and failed to prove a lawful source for the assets, relying only on unspecified honoraria without evidence. The court also held that civil forfeiture proceedings are independent of any pending criminal trial. It rejected claims that simultaneous civil and criminal processes amounted to an abuse of judicial process, affirming that the EFCC may pursue asset forfeiture even while related criminal charges remain unresolved. Assets forfeited include cash, several plots in Abuja’s Outer Northern Expressway and Kuje District, farmland in Bayelsa State, and 30,000 MTN shares. Investigations revealed alleged diversion of over N8.5 billion from NIMASA funds through proxy companies during Operation Pulo Shield.

38
6

Use The App To Win ₦1m

Google PlayApp Store

Stories are shared by community members. This article does not represent the official view of NaijaWorld — the author is solely responsible for its content.

H
halaabout 7 hours ago

What impact could this ruling have on deterring future high-ranking officials from financial misconduct in Nigeria?

0
F
femiabout 6 hours ago

True talk! This ruling fit sharp message, make officers think twice before shuffling public funds.

0
G
graceabout 7 hours ago

It's puzzling that such large assets were traced only after service retirement, raising questions about investigative timing and thoroughness.

0
E
emekaabout 6 hours ago

I see your point, but asset tracing often spans years. Retirement timing may not be the only factor.

0
Y
yemiabout 6 hours ago

This decision might seem straightforward, but it glosses over potential procedural gaps in tracing those assets after so many years.

0
K
krisabout 6 hours ago

Civil society groups should push for stronger asset monitoring laws and transparent registers to prevent similar cases in future.

0

More from Crime