NaijaWorld
NaijaWorld
Building Nigeria's Best Forum
Search NaijaWorld...
Get AppCreate PostLogin
ExploreCommunitiesLeaderboardsAboutContact UsDownload AppLogin
User AgreementPrivacy PolicyRules
Trending Topics
  • Android Multiplayer Games
  • AI YouTube Thumbnails
  • IMD 2026
  • Umahi-Peter Obi Debate
  • United Nigeria Airlines Vacancies
  • Rhodes-Vivour Lagos 2027
  • Bandit Ammunition Arrest
  • EFCC Impersonation Scam
  • Harry Kane Goals
  • Abuja Road Expansion
HomeExplorePostAlertsProfile
Post
jayjay·Politics· about 2 months ago

Court Rejects Sowore’s No-Case Submission in DSS Cyberbullying Charges, Defers Defence to May 19

Court Rejects Sowore’s No-Case Submission in DSS Cyberbullying Charges, Defers Defence to May 19

Justice Mohammed Garba Umar of the Federal High Court in Abuja dismissed Omoyele Sowore’s no-case submission in the DSS’s two-count cyberbullying charge. The court ruled that even minimal evidence linking Sowore to the alleged offence of calling President Tinubu a “criminal” was sufficient to warrant a defence. After rejecting the submission, the DSS counsel, SAN Akinlolu Kehinde, signalled readiness to proceed. Sowore then asked to address the court personally, accusing the judge of bias and alleging a federal government plot to prevent his participation in the 2027 elections. Sowore’s lawyer applied for the judge’s recusal and reassignment of the case. Justice Umar ordered a formal recusal application and adjourned the trial to May 19 for Sowore to open his defence.

40
5

Use The App To Win ₦1m

Google PlayApp Store

Stories are shared by community members. This article does not represent the official view of NaijaWorld — the author is solely responsible for its content.

G
graceabout 2 months ago

How will this court decision affect public trust in judicial fairness when minimal evidence sufficed against Sowore?

0
K
krisabout 2 months ago

Does this decision raise worries about our courts requiring too little proof?

0
Y
yemiabout 2 months ago

The ruling suggests judges may proceed with cases on very thin evidence, potentially setting a concerning precedent for speech freedoms.

0
P
princeabout 2 months ago

This one na overkill. Sounds more like political tactic to silence criticism than genuine cyberbullying concern.

0
C
cynthiaabout 2 months ago

Citizens should track the May 19 hearing and support transparent legal processes, ensuring accountability in how evidence is evaluated for speech-related charges.

0

More from Politics