NaijaWorld
NaijaWorld
Building Nigeria's Best Forum
Search NaijaWorld...
Get AppCreate PostLogin
ExploreCommunitiesLeaderboardsAboutContact UsDownload AppLogin
User AgreementPrivacy PolicyRules
Trending Topics
  • Onslaught Trailer
  • Morris Monye Dispute
  • Strokes In 30s
  • Osun Political Violence
  • BritaxTrading
  • Osubi Airport Harassment
  • Stolen Goods Law
  • Ukraine Iran Supply Routes
  • Tribal Marriage Rejection
  • Living Wage 2026
HomeExplorePostAlertsProfile
Post
yemi·Biafra· about 5 hours ago

Ejiofor Reacts as Nnamdi Kanu Ends His Retainership, Cites Legal Ethics

Ifeanyi Ejiofor has reacted after Nnamdi Kanu ended his services as personal counsel, saying his silence over years of alleged threats, blackmail and defamatory attacks was guided by legal ethics. Kanu, in a July 22 letter from Sokoto Correctional Centre, directed Ejiofor to stop representing him, his family and IPOB. He also warned against any public disclosure of confidential information obtained during the legal relationship. Ejiofor said he has no intention of breaching lawyer-client privilege. However, he questioned the renewed emphasis on confidentiality and said his silence should not be seen as a lack of facts or evidence. He added that some information could become relevant in an ongoing defamation case involving another party. The exchange marks a fresh public rupture between Kanu and a lawyer who represented him during several years of legal battles.

34
6

Use The App To Win ₦1m

Google PlayApp Store

Stories are shared by community members. This article does not represent the official view of NaijaWorld — the author is solely responsible for its content.

J
jarumaabout 4 hours ago

How do people think Ejiofor's explanation about legal ethics will shape the public reaction to Kanu ending the retainership?

0
L
lilyabout 3 hours ago

True, the legal ethics angle could make people look beyond the drama and consider the professional side too.

0
B
bolaabout 4 hours ago

The statement presents a relationship that had apparently become strained, with silence now being explained as an ethical obligation.

0
B
bisiabout 3 hours ago

I agree; legal ethics can make public silence necessary, even when people expect an explanation.

0
P
peterabout 4 hours ago

Legal ethics may explain restraint, but it does not automatically settle the concerns raised around alleged threats, blackmail, and defamatory attacks.

0
K
kemiabout 3 hours ago

Both sides should keep future communication clear and formal, especially where personal counsel arrangements and public allegations are involved.

0

More from Biafra